Case studies · Mid-sized pharmaceutical company and marketing authorisation holder
Qualified Person (QP) and Head of Production provided
A marketing authorisation holder needed a Qualified Person (QP) for batch release and, for a period, a Head of Production. We provided both, and business operations continued.
How it went
Starting point, approach, outcome.
Told plainly, in the order it actually happened.
Topic areas
Responsible for this case
Anonymised. Confidentiality is part of our business; we only name clients with their consent.
Starting point
What the client came to us with.
The client also wanted advice on implementing quality assurance measures within the company. For a period, a Head of Production was needed as well.
Approach
What we actually did.
We also gave the client strategic advice on implementing quality assurance measures and monitored compliance with them.
Outcome
The outcome.
In a similar situation?
Speak directly with Dr. Klaus-Peter Kreth.
No ticketing system, no switchboard passing you on. You will hear back within one to two days.
More case studies
Similar projects.
Clinical trial sponsor, biotech company
Comparator sourced, labelled and released
An authorised medicinal product was to serve as a comparator in a clinical trial. We oversaw its GMP-compliant sourcing and labelling and release...
Read the full case studyInternational pharmaceutical services company headquartered in the USA with locations in the EU
Compassionate use programme: QP release
Patients were to receive a medicinal product not yet authorised for their indication. We oversaw its GMP-compliant transfer into the compassionat...
Read the full case studyClinical trial sponsor, small innovative biotech company
Novel manufacturing process, supported through to phase 2a
A multi-stage manufacturing process with many manual steps was to be automated in compliance with GMP. The phase 2a trial went ahead, and product...
Read the full case study